Hội thảo CÁC NGHIÊN CỨU TIÊN TIẾN TRONG KHOA HỌC NHIỆT VÀ LƯU CHẤT
Khoa Công nghệ Nhiệt Lạnh
-164-
ΔTmin ANALYSIS WHEN APPLYING PINCH TECHNOLOGY TO DESIGN
HEAT RECOVERY EXCHANGER OF TUBE ICE MACHINE
Nghia - Hieu Nguyen 1, Truyen – Cong Duong 2
1 Faculty of Heat & Refrigeration Engineering, Industry University of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;
, 2 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Industry University of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;
1 nguyenhieunghia@iuh.edu.vn; 2 duongcongtruyen@iuh.e
9 trang |
Chia sẻ: Tài Huệ | Ngày: 19/02/2024 | Lượt xem: 105 | Lượt tải: 0
Tóm tắt tài liệu ΔTmin analysis when applying pinch technology to design heat recovery exchanger of tube ice machine, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
du.vn
Abstract. In current situation, ice product will not be enough to meet higher demand in the coming years.
So, the construction of ice machine suitable to production need, reasonable price with high efficiency which
are always put on top by investors. Particularly, the urgent requirement of economical machine price and
efficient use of energy, the application of Pinch technology for calculation and design to optimize the heat
recovery component, increase system productivity is pioneering application research. The applied Pinch
technology 3 tons/day tube ice machine capacity brings higher specific cooling capacity, heat recovery of
heat recovery component and the coefficient of performance compare to traditional designed tube ice
machine, alternate as follows:
o Heat recovery: QRe-Tra = 2.01 kW, QRe-Pinch = 6.17 kW (increase 207%).
o Coefficient of performance: COPTra = 3.61, COPPinch = 3.72 (increase 11%).
Keywords. Tube ice machine, heat recovery pinch, efficient tube ice machine, pinch design.
PHÂN TICH ΔTmin KHI ỨNG DỤNG KỸ THUẬT PINCH TÍNH TOÁN
THIẾT KẾ BỘ HOÁN NHIỆT CỦA MÁY NƯỚC ĐÁ ỐNG
Tóm tắt. Trong tình hình hiện nay, sản phẩm nước đá sẽ không đủ đáp ứng nhu cầu tăng cao trong những
năm tới. Vì thế, cấu trúc của máy sản xuất nước đá phải phù hợp với nhu cầu sản xuất, giá cả hợp lý với
hiệu suất cao luôn luôn được các nhà đầu tư đặt lên hàng đầu. Cụ thể, yêu cầu cấp thiết là cạnh tranh về giá
máy và hiệu quả sử dụng năng lượng nên việc ứng dụng kỹ thuật Pinch cho việc tính toán và thiết kế để tối
ưu bộ hồi nhiệt, tăng năng suất hệ thống là nghiên cứu ứng dụng tiên phong. Việc áp dụng kỹ thuật Pinch
cho máy sản xuất nước đá ống có năng suất 3 tấn/ngày có năng suất lạnh riêng cao hơn, nhiệt lượng thu hồi
từ bộ thu hồi nhiệt cao hơn, và hệ số hiệu quả nhiệt cũng cao hơn so với máy nước đá ống có thiết kế truyền
thống lần lượt như sau:
o Nhiệt thu hồi: QRe-Tra = 2.01 kW, QRe-Pinch = 6.17 kW (increase 207%).
o Hệ số hiệu quả nhiệt: COPTra = 3.61, COPPinch = 3.72 (increase 11%).
Keywords. Máy nước đá ống, pinch thu hồi nhiệt, máy nước đá ống hiệu quả, pinch thiết kế.
1 INTRODUCTION
The burgeoning global food and beverage industry is supporting the adoption of ice machine systems. The
ice maker segment dominates the global ice production industry as the use of these machines increases in
the residential and commercial segments. The need to use ice cubes for alcoholic beverages consumption
and refreshments at home, offices, universities, hotels, bars, ... are supporting the increase in sales of the
machines. The size of the global ice making market in 2018 was more than US $ 1.5 billion and is estimated
to grow by 6% from 2019 to 2025. When assessing the market's import / export countries, it was found that
the United States was the largest importer of ice machines, followed by Germany, France, Great Britain
HNKH-17
Hội thảo CÁC NGHIÊN CỨU TIÊN TIẾN TRONG KHOA HỌC NHIỆT VÀ LƯU CHẤT
Khoa Công nghệ Nhiệt Lạnh
-165-
and Canada. On the other hand, China represents the next largest exporter, followed by Mexico, Italy, the
United States and South Korea [1].
In recent years, global demand for ice machines has increased, with a growth rate of around 5% -20%,
depending on the economic, industrial and environmental conditions of each country and area [2]. The
major global competitors in ice production are KTI in Germany, Manitowoc in the US, Scotsman in Italy,
Iceman in Japan, Hoshizaki in Japan, Northstar in the United States, Geneglace in France and Snowman in
China.
The ever-increasing demand for ice has pushed ice production facilities to always run at full capacity and
expand production. According to statistics on yellowpages.vnn.vn. In Ho Chi Minh City, there are over 200
production facilities, are distributing ice. Companies and production facilities of ice machines are constantly
improving to meet the needs of customers. Research activities are largely focused on refrigerant, treatment
of ice making water, improvement of ice machine performance. In particular, in the urgent requirement of
economical and efficient use of energy, the application of Pinch technology to the calculation and design
to optimize the heat recovery component, increase system productivity is a pioneering application research.
On the Vietnamese market today, there are many ice making machines of different brands with many
different capacities (output from 300 ÷ 1800 kg/day for small households and small businesses; 5 ÷ 10
tons/day for medium facilities; and over 25 tons/day for industrial factories) [3]. In order to serve small and
medium households business, limited space, an tube ice machine with a capacity of 3 tons/day is reasonable
on building basis formulae system for calculation, detailed design of tube ice machine parts. The principle
diagram of 3 tons/day tube ice machine is shown in figure 1.
In order to minimize the energy consumption of this tube ice machine, maximizing heat recovery of the
heat recovery component is considered by the Pinch technology.
2 APPLY PINCH TECHNOLOGY TO THE CALCULATION AND DESIGN
2.1 Using Pinch technology to calculate heat transfer of heat recovery component
The parameters at the heat recovery component:
Figure 1. Principle diagram of the tube ice machine
Hội thảo CÁC NGHIÊN CỨU TIÊN TIẾN TRONG KHOA HỌC NHIỆT VÀ LƯU CHẤT
Khoa Công nghệ Nhiệt Lạnh
-166-
o Liquid refrigerant temperature go into the heat recovery component: t4 = 39 oC
o Liquid refrigerant temperature go out from the heat recovery component: t5 = 34 oC
o Vapor refrigerant temperature go into the heat recovery component: t8 = -15 oC
o Vapor refrigerant temperature go out from the heat recovery component: t1 = -5.4 oC
o Mass flow rate of liquid and vapor refrigerant moving in the tube: ml = 0.083 kg/s
o Mass flow rate of vapor refrigerant moving outside the tube: mv = 0.083 kg/s
o Specific heat of liquid refrigerant: Cp-l = 4.845 kJ/kg.K
o Specific heat of overheating vapor refrigerant: Cp-v = 2.517 kJ/kg.K
Cool and hot flow determination
Cooling effect and heating effect:
o Qheat = 0.209 x |−10 ± −5.4|= 2.01 kW
o Qcool = 0.402 x |34 − 39| = 2.01 kW
In table 1, the heating effect and cooling effect under steady state condition (constant heat capacities and
temperatures) which must be supplied by external heater and cooler such as steam water and cold water.
The idea is now to find the lowest possible Qcool for this particular problem.
Now, the inlet and outlet temperatures can be divided into temperature interval numbers where the first
temperature interval is between the maximum and the second largest. The next interval is between the
second and third largest temperature, ... Results between such temperature intervals are shown in table 2.
One can calculate the amount of heat to be supplied to a plant (called Qheat) and how much heat must be
Figure 2. Heat recovery component
Table 1. Process stream in the heat recovery component
Process stream
Inlet temp.
[oC]
Outlet temp.
[oC]
Heat capacity rate,
m.Cp [kW/K]
Q [kW]
1. Cold -15 -5.4 0.209 2.01
2. Hot 39 34 0.402 2.01
Table 2. Temperature interval and external heating and cooling effects
Interval
Number
Temperature
interval [oC]
Stream
Numbers
Qcood
[kW]
Qheat
[kW]
ΔQ
[kW]
1 39 – 34 2 2.01 0 2.01
2 34 – -5.4 0 0 0 0
3 -5.4 – -15 1 0 2.01 -2.01
Hội thảo CÁC NGHIÊN CỨU TIÊN TIẾN TRONG KHOA HỌC NHIỆT VÀ LƯU CHẤT
Khoa Công nghệ Nhiệt Lạnh
-167-
taken from the plant (called Qcool). The relationship between external cooling and heating can be written:
ΔQ = Qcool-1 – Qheat-1 = 2,01 – 0 = 2,01 kW
The ΔTmin value
The best heat exchanger design must satisfy the technical and economic considerations. This depends
directly on the choice of mean temperature difference ΔTmin. The smaller the Tmin, the larger the heat
exchange area, resulting in lower energy costs but higher investment costs. Therefore, the total annual cost
is the function of ΔTmin is the combination of energy cost (effectiveness) and investment cost. These
objective functions are presented as follows [4]:
TAC ($year−1) = aCin + Cop)
Cin ($) = b1 x Atot
b2
Cop ($year
−1) = (kel τ
∆PVt
ηis
)
c
+ (kel τ
∆PVt
ηis
)
h
Here, Cin, Cop, kel, Ꞇ, ΔP, Vt, and ηis are the investment cost, operational cost, electricity unit cost, operational
hours in a year, pressure drop, volumetric flow rate, and isentropic efficiency of the pump, respectively. Also,
b1 and b2 are considered to be constant, and a is the annualized factor presented below:
a =
i
i − (1 + i)−n
Where i and n are the interest rate and system lifetime, respectively.
For calculating the heat recovery component in the tube ice machine system, the low temperature process
with ΔTmin = (3 ÷ 5 oC). We choose the temperature ΔTmin = 4 oC. ΔTmin = 4 oC is reduced from hot streams,
meaning the hot stream will be cooled by 4 oC. Therefore, a new temperature range that can be calculated
is indicated in Table 3.
Figure 3. Cost distribution of ΔTmin
Hội thảo CÁC NGHIÊN CỨU TIÊN TIẾN TRONG KHOA HỌC NHIỆT VÀ LƯU CHẤT
Khoa Công nghệ Nhiệt Lạnh
-168-
The Problem Table Algorithm (PTA)
Where Ti and Ti+1 corresponds to upper and lower temperatures in the arbitrary temperature interval i. The
important following condition:
o Di < 0 need for cooling
o Di > 0 need for heating
The energy balance for the arbitrary block i can be calculated by Qi,i+1 = Qi-1,1 - Di
Where Qi-1,i and Qi,i+1 are the supplied heat and removed heat respectively for each block. Initially the
supplied heat Q0, for block 1 is set to Q0,1 = 0.
Table 4 shows the calculated supplied and removed heat for each temperature interval (block):
Table 3. Temperature interval for Tmin = 4 oC.
Interval Number
Temperature interval
[oC]
Stream Numbers
Qcool
[kW]
Qheat
[kW]
ΔQ
[kW]
1 35 – 30 2 2.01 0 2.01
2 30 – -5.4 0 0 0 0
3 -5.4 – -15 1 0 2.01 -2.01
Table 4. Sequential balance problem with ΔTmin = 4 oC
Sequential balance Max table
Interval Temp. limits Di
•
Qi−1,i
•
Qi,i+1
•
Qi−1,i
•
Qi,i+1
1 35 – 30 2.01 0 -2.01 2.01 0
2 30 – -5.4 0 -2.01 -2.01 0 0
3 -5.4 – -15 -2,01 -2.01 0 0 2.01
Hội thảo CÁC NGHIÊN CỨU TIÊN TIẾN TRONG KHOA HỌC NHIỆT VÀ LƯU CHẤT
Khoa Công nghệ Nhiệt Lạnh
-169-
The combination of heat flows and temperature is shown in Figure 4 from the results of Table 4. From the
Grand composite curve of heat recovery component curve inform about the received heat flow and the
supplied heat flow is obtained through a pinch point temperature of 18.5 oC. That is, the cold stream has
the potential to receive more heat to further increase from -5.4 oC to 14.5 oC and the hot stream has the
potential to remove more heat to reduce the temperature from 30 oC to 18.5 oC with ΔTmin = 4 oC.
Design of Heat Exchanger Network (HEN)
In order to design the HEN for the example above it is useful to create tables in which the streams
specifications above and below the pinch temperature are shown, see tables 5. Note that the pinch
temperature was 18.5 oC, therefore, above the pinch temperature the cold streams shall be heated from 14.5
oC (if ΔTmin = 4 oC) while the hot streams must be cooled to 18.5 oC.
For stream above the pinch point, the hot stream 2 need 2.35 kW (8.24 – 6.17 = 2.07 kW) can be provided
by external cooling (Table 5).
Figure 4. Grand composite curve of heat recovery component
Table 5. Process streams above and below the pinch with ΔTmin = 4 oC
Process stream
Inlet Temp.
(oC)
Outlet Temp.
(oC)
Heat capacity rate
m.Cp (kW/K)
Q (kW)
1. Cold - 15 14.5 0,209 6.17
2. Hot 39 18.5 0.402 8.24
Hội thảo CÁC NGHIÊN CỨU TIÊN TIẾN TRONG KHOA HỌC NHIỆT VÀ LƯU CHẤT
Khoa Công nghệ Nhiệt Lạnh
-170-
After determining the heat flows above and below the pinch temperature, the designer calculates all heat
exchangers to recover heat from all the hot and cold streams of the plant. In this tube ice machine, the heat
needed to recover to increase the cooling capacity is only in the heat recovery component. So, there is only
1 flow below and one flow above the pinch temperature. When the liquid line is sub cooling (hot stream 2)
to maximize heat, the difference in heat between the two flows is ΔQ = 2.07 kW. Here, the average
temperature of cold stream 1 is 14.5 oC and the average temperature of hot stream 2 is 18.5 oC. The
temperatures of both flows are now lower than the ambient temperature in Ho Chi Minh City (31.5 oC). So,
the heat from the environment will penetrate into the system if it is not well insulated.
Solving the problem of the number of heat flows and choosing the number of heat exchangers, designer
must consider whether the combination of these heat flows is suitable and the minimum number of heat
exchangers is required to save the investment costs. In this study, the heat transfer area of the heat recovery
component only needs to be increased to exchange the heat from 2.01 kW to 6.17 kW.
2.2 Recalculate the tube ice machine cycle when applying Pinch technology
The working mode of the machine is characterized by the following parameters:
o Refrigerant: R22
o Evaporating temperature: t8 = -15 oC
o Condensing temperature tk: t4 = 39 oC
o Sub-cooling liquid temperature before the expansion valve tql: t5 = 18.5 oC
o Refrigerant vapor temperature drawn to the compressor th: t1 = 14.5 oC
Figure 5. Grid diagram of heat exchanger network
Table 6. Compare the applied Pinch technology and non-applied Pinch technology to the system
Specification The system not applied Pinch
technology
The system applied Pinch
technology
Heat recovery in heat recovery
component Qr (kW)
2.01 6.17
Coefficient of Performance
COP
3.61 3.72
Hội thảo CÁC NGHIÊN CỨU TIÊN TIẾN TRONG KHOA HỌC NHIỆT VÀ LƯU CHẤT
Khoa Công nghệ Nhiệt Lạnh
-171-
3 ECONOMIC TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
The economic and technical calculations for investing in a tube ice machine with a capacity of 3 tons/day.
The capital cost is calculated on the basis that the machine is manufactured in Vietnam. The profit is from
the selling price of ice minus the cost of production:
o Selling price of ice is 8000 VND for each bag of 21 kg of ice.
o Production cost include: cost of water, cost of electricity and cost of labor.
Capital cost:
o Materials and equipment cost of the tube ice machine: 226.589.025 VND.
o Labor cost for the construction of the tube ice machine: 57.000.000 VND.
o Capital cost of the tube ice machine C = 283.589.025 VND.
Payback time calculation
With the production time, each day producing 2 shifts (16 hours), each year is 317 days, the payback period
of the traditional design tube ice machine is 3.75 years and that of the pinch design tube ice machine is 3.65
years, 1.2 months down (decrease 2.7% payback period). The inflation rate and discount rate are 8% and
12% respectively. The profitability of the tube ice machine according to the pinch design is higher than that
of the traditional design as shown in Table 6.
Figure 6. Payback period of pinch design and traditional design
Hội thảo CÁC NGHIÊN CỨU TIÊN TIẾN TRONG KHOA HỌC NHIỆT VÀ LƯU CHẤT
Khoa Công nghệ Nhiệt Lạnh
-172-
4 CONCLUSION
Research shows that 3 tons/day capacity tube ice machine with Pinch technology to the calculation and
design to optimize the heat recovery component bringing higher heat recover from heat recovery component
and coefficient of performance compare to traditional designed tube ice machine, alternate as follows:
1. Heat recovery: QRe-Tra = 2.01 kW, QRe-Pinch = 6.17 kW (increase 207%)
2. Coefficient of performance: COPTra = 3.61, COPPinch = 3.72 (increase 11%)
3. Profit of 1 batch (VND): 7.204 VND/batch vs 7.405 VND/batch (increase 2.8%)
4. Payback time (year): 3.75 years vs 3.65 years (decrease 2.7%)
REFERENCES
[1] A. Alpher, Frobnication, Journal of Foo, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 234-778, 2002.
[2] A. Alpher and J. P. N. Fotheringham-Smythe, Frobnication revisited, Journal of Foo, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 234-778,
2003.
[3] https://www.vogtice.com/products/.
[4] Zahra Hajabdollahi, Hassan Hajabdollahi, Kyung Chun Kim; Heat transfer enhancement and optimization of a
tube fitted with twisted tape in a fin-and-tube heat exchanger; Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry; Akade
miai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary 2019
[5] Sepehr Sanaye*, Hassan Hajabdollahi; Multi-objective optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers; Applied
Thermal Engineering 30 (2010) 1937e1945
[6] A. Alpher, J. P. N. Fotheringham-Smythe, and G. Gamow, Can a machine frobnicate?, Journal of Foo, vol. 14, no.
1, pp. 234-778, 2004.
[7] V. Arnold, K. Vogtmann, and A. Weinstein, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, ser. Graduate Texts
in Mathematics. Springer, 1989.
[8] FLEXChip Signal Processor (MC68175/D), Motorola, 1996.
[9] M.-T. Pham, O. J. Woodford, F. Perbet, A. Maki, and B. Stenger. (2012) Toshiba CAD model point clouds dataset.
[Online]. Available:
Points.
[10] M.-T. Pham, O. J. Woodford, F. Perbet, A. Maki, B. Stenger, and R. Cipolla, A new distance for scale-invariant
3D shape recognition and registration, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, 2011, pp. 145-152.
[11] M.-T. Pham, O. J. Woodford, F. Perbet, A. Maki, B. Stenger, and R. Cipolla, An image processing method and
system, US Patent 20130016913 (A1), 2013.
[12] L. A. Santalo, Integral geometry and geometric probability, in Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications,
G. C. Rota, Ed. Addison-Wesley, 1976, vol. 1.
Table 6. Compare the obtained Interest of pinch design and traditional design
Specification The machine of
traditional design
The machine of pinch
design
Profit of 1 batch (VNĐ) 7.204 7.405
Profit of 1 day (VNĐ) 230.523 236.954
Profit of 1 year (VNĐ) 73.076.000 75.115.000
Payback time (year) 3.75 3.65
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- tmin_analysis_when_applying_pinch_technology_to_design_heat.pdf